County math results mixed

» 9 Comments | Post a Comment

By CHERYL K. CHUMLEY

For the third year running, 90 percent of Prince William third-graders passed their Standards of Learning math tests.

But for the first time in five years, students of this exam "fell below the state average for advanced ranking," said parent Greg Barlow.

And that, he says, is proof Math Investigations—an elementary curriculum Barlow would like to see removed, or at least supplemented and offered as an option—isn't working.

"What happened [with the passing rate] is that we are basically just holding our own," he said. "We're at the same place as last year, and this is the program they said was so great. But the overall pass rate was flatlined."

To county elementary math coordinator Linda Zborofsky, however, the flatline is really indicative of success.

"The third-grade math scores were good," she said. "For the first year of implementation of a new program, they stayed the same, and that's good."

Zborofsky also found fault with Barlow's interpretation of figures pointing to the dwindling number of students who pass the math test with advanced, rather than just proficient, scores.

For this most recent 2007-08 test of third-graders, 49 percent passed the math SOL with an advanced score, com-pared to the state average of 51 percent. However, in previous consecutive school years, between 2002-03 and 2006-07, third-graders in Prince William surpassed the state average for advanced scores in math.

At the same time, fourth- and fifth-graders who were not taught the Investigations curriculum did beat the state proficiency average in the most recent SOL math tests—by an 88 percent to 84 percent margin in fourth grade, and 91 percent to 88 percent margin in fifth grade, results indicate. These students also beat state averages for advanced math scores, according to test results.

"I look for trends," Barlow said. "Something's not quite right."

To point fingers at Investigations for any dip in advanced-rate scores, however, is erroneous, Zborofsky said. While it's true, the numbers of third-graders passing math with advanced scores have been declining for years, Math Investigations could not possibly be to blame because the program wasn't implemented in the third grade until this past school year, she said.

That means previous years' drops can only be reflective of traditional teaching methods in math, Zborofsky said.

One point to note: Barlow's viewpoint comes by way of comparing county scores with statewide averages. Zborofsky's is a look only at county third-grade SOL math scores for the past few years. Beginning with the 2002-03 school year, 49 percent of county third-graders passed the math SOL with an advanced score. That was followed by percentage rates of 53, then 61; then 56; and twice in a row, 49.

On a statewide level, 47 percent of third-graders passed the math SOLs in 2002-03 with advanced scores. For the next three years, that number stood at 52 percent, followed by 48 percent in 2006-07 and 51 percent in the latest year, 2007-08.

Three school board members contacted for additional comment did not return calls in time for deadline.

Investigations is an elementary curriculum that replaces memorization of basic facts, like multiplication tables, with a less rigid, more illustrative and explanatory approach. Children are sometimes required to draw pictures of their addition problems, for instance.

Last year, Barlow and several other concerned parents started a Web site and petition drive to compel the School Board to remove the program from the schools, or at the very least give teachers the freedom to supplement it with more traditional teaching methods.

School Board members, along with the superintendent and his staff, issued several statements of support for the program—though a few board members did begin to express concern with the number and content of complaints received by e-mail. As such, a voting majority on the board finally sought a work session to be scheduled after SOL scores were released.

On Sept. 17, that work session will go forth, and it's expected these SOL results will be part and parcel of discussions.

Staff writer Cheryl Chumley can be reached at 703-670-1907.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by blue_doggette on September 08, 2008 at 10:06 pm

GainesvilleMom, what ARE you talking about?  Do you even know?  Do some comparison of SOL results.  I think you will find out Prince William is doing just fine.

Flag Comment Posted by GainesvilleMom on September 08, 2008 at 10:26 am

Here we go again.  Satisfied with low tests scores and spinning them to be something positive.  Let’s be real, the SOL’s are not the SAT’s.  We should have as our goal in PWCS a pass rate that is significantly higher than the state pass rate for both pass-advanced and pass scores.  Aren’t we the second largest school district in the great state of Virginia?  What kind of mediocre example are we setting for the rest of the state when the school system gets excited about mediocre tests scores?  C’mon folks, if the program is broken, FIX IT!  It is time to cut the losses on the failure of Math Investigations and get back to teaching our students real math.  By the way, where are those other test results that everyone is asking for?  Are those harder to spin?

Flag Comment Posted by edbrm1 on September 08, 2008 at 6:55 am

So one test does not make a trend; how about last years SDMT tests.
They show PWCS 1st and
2nd graders only achieving overall 45th and 50th percentile scores respectively ranked on a NATIONAL scale.
No matter how you look at it that is POOR PERFORMANCE!
They won’t even release this years results before the investigations work session.

Flag Comment Posted by edbrm1 on September 08, 2008 at 6:37 am

I have been deeply researching the program and what my son is able to do without help compared to my daughter at the same age with traditional math.
It is not the one test but the trend. The trend in traditional math is up, the trend in investigations is down even with all the private tutoring.
My son is bored and the lifework is a joke. There is not enough practice to learn simple math facts.
These children are doomed to take remedial math or be rejected from Universities unless the parents teach them and not all parents can.

Flag Comment Posted by blue_doggette on September 07, 2008 at 8:59 am

I also know that one set of test results proves nothing.  You need to look at several years worth of tests to draw legitimate conclusions—regardless of the subject.

Flag Comment Posted by blue_doggette on September 07, 2008 at 8:51 am

No, I am not employed by the math dept in Prince William County.  I have made it my business to find out a little about the program since I have little ones using the program.  I also know that students who understand math concepts go further in math than those who do not.  Memorizing facts and algorithms are a tool, not the basics of math.

Flag Comment Posted by edbrm1 on September 05, 2008 at 7:43 am

The commenter supporting investigations is presumably connected with the Math Department who are still in complete denial about the total failure of investigations.
If it wasn’t for all the home schooling and private tutoring which has suddenly become necessary, the results would have been a lot worse.

Flag Comment Posted by fp richards on September 04, 2008 at 9:00 am

Mr. Barlow is right on the mark!  After 2 years of PWCS officials refusing to listen to parents’ concerns the results are out and they’re blaming a parent.  Kids had 2 years of indoctrination in “fuzzy math” where drawing pictures of squirrels, playing games, and not being allowed to use traditional proven concepts and algoritms—and the test scores showed the results.  Just look at Grades 4 & 5 results, excelling across the board and the difference is those kids got to learn real math with real textbooks and real instruction. 

Parents are tired of hearing the same old cliches about “understanding math better than memorizing math”—you can’t understand math if you’re not given the opportunity to learn and this program is dumbed down to the extreme.  Why won’t PWCS allow parents a choice?  Probably because they squandered millions of our tax dollars on this program!!

Flag Comment Posted by blue_doggette on September 04, 2008 at 5:36 am

Mr. Barlow should know that one testing cycle of a criterion referenced test shows nothing.  He cannot legitimately use 1 year of test results in one grade level. 

Understanding math is better than memorizing math.  My children have flourished under this program.  Thanks you Carol Knight for making it possible and working tirelessly to keep this program despite the nay-sayers.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement