Powell’s lawyers try to stop execution
Published: July 6, 2009
Updated: July 6, 2009
Lawyers for a Virginia inmate scheduled to die next week for killing a 16-year-old friend are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop the execution.
Lawyers for a Virginia inmate scheduled to die next week for killing a 16-year-old — then bragging about it to prosecutors when he thought he couldn’t face the death penalty — are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop the execution.
Paul Warner Powell’s lawyers argue that he was unconstitutionally convicted twice for the 1999 murder and attempted rape of Yorkshire teen Stacie Reed.
Powell, 31, was convicted in 2000 of killing Reed and raping and trying to kill her 14-year-old relative. He was sentenced to die for Reed’s murder.
The Virginia Supreme Court overturned Powell’s capital conviction, saying that Prince William County prosecutors failed to prove Powell tried to rob or rape Reed. In order to face capital punishment, defendants must commit other crimes against the victim or meet other aggravating circumstances.
Thinking he could no longer face the death penalty, Powell wrote a profanity-laced, taunting letter to prosecutors offering graphic detail of how he tried to rape Reed before he stabbed her three times and stomped on her throat until she quit breathing.
“Do you just hate yourself for being so stupid and for (messing) up and saving me?’’ he wrote to Commonwealth’s Attorney Paul Ebert in 2001.
Ebert threw out Powell’s earlier indictment and charged him with killing and attempting to rape Reed. Powell was convicted again in 2003 and given the death penalty.
Powell’s lawyers asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block the execution until it can decide whether his second capital murder charge violated the Fifth Amendment’s protection against being tried twice for the same offense.
They argue that convicting Powell the second time “sets a dangerous precedent in which prosecutors now may pursue multiple attempts to secure a sentence of death.’’
State and federal courts have repeatedly rejected Powell’s double jeopardy argument, saying that the original charge was different because he was not accused of attempting to rape Reed.
A divided federal appeals court panel once again denied Powell’s claim in April, with Justice Roger L. Gregory dissenting.
Gregory called Powell’s crime “atrocious’’ but said his second conviction amounted to double jeopardy.
“Given the explicit details revealed by Powell in his letter to the Commonwealth’s attorney, one understands the strong inclination to prosecute Powell for those heinous acts,’’ he wrote. “Yet, it is in these very cases that we must be most vigilant in protecting our long-standing constitutional guarantees.’’
Ebert said he didn’t think the court would stop the execution because Powell was tried for two separate crimes.
“The two things have entirely different elements, entirely different facts, entirely different victims,’’ he said. “It’s not double jeopardy.’’
Ebert said he plans to witness the execution with Reed’s family.
If the Supreme Court rejects Powell’s request for a stay, his last hope would be Gov. Timothy M. Kaine.
Powell’s lawyers sent a letter to Kaine last month asking for clemency. They argue that jurors were given evidence that Powell had been convicted of at least one additional murder, which he had not. Courts have acknowledged the mistake, but said it was not enough to overturn the conviction.
“The case of Paul Powell involves an individual who clearly evokes no one’s sympathy,’’ Powell’s lawyers wrote. “Still, confidence in the justice system requires that jurors be given accurate information prior to being asked to choose between life without parole and a death sentence.’’
If Powell is executed, he will be the 104th inmate put to death in Virginia since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. Virginia ranks second only to Texas — with 439 — in the number of executions carried out over that period.
Powell has chosen to die by electrocution instead of lethal injection.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
A lawyer that doesn’t fight to the end isn’t going to be a lawyer long. The lawyers are just doing their job. It’s not always a pleasant job, but it’s what they do. Don’t worry, Powell’s not going to get off.
So many Of the posters on this matter are pbvious;y against the US judcicial system, and biased against lawyer.
Lots of court cases have been overturned because of poor l,egal representation. The lawyer must therefor do his best.
Shows the bias and ignorance in PWC.
liljen i agree with you about him I went to school with stacie and kristie. he came to some of our schools get togethers and he was the worst. I felt so bad. I hope that his lawyers are unsuccessful also they should be ashamed for even trying to defend him.
I dont know what all the hoopla is about - this person deserves to die and if he chooses the electric chair of injection, so be it, as long as HE is put to death. As I have been told many time before, give a person enough rope and they will hang themselves. This he did when wrote that letter to Paul Ebert. The world will be better off without him and the tax payers wont have to continue to support him.
liljen53 probably hit the nail on the head. Kids can always tell when someone is just sick and twisted.
Alfonso, if we didn’t have lawyers their would be no one to prosecute Mr Powell and he would be walking free. If we want to have a just legal system there has to be fair representation on both sides of the aisle, and when the system works properly people like Powell are found guilty.
I grew up with and went to school with Paul and let me tell you…he is as sick and twisted as he appears. None of what he did surprises me, and I hope his lawyers are unsuccessful at delaying/stopping his execution. He is a dangerous person, and is incapable of remorse.
A lawyer didn’t commit the crime. He is doing his job to try to get his client off but at the end of the day justice prevails. It must suck to have a job defending someone who get away with the crime then brags about what he did to Ebert in a letter which is what convicted him and got him the death penalty the second time. What an idiot. Sounds like the Powell will get what he deserve the lawyer will get to move on.
Rose, I always appreciate when someone provides a link. Thank you.
“One of the lawyers, Jonathan P. Sheldon, said yesterday that Powell told him he would choose electrocution because he had helped persuade Brandon Hedrick to do so. Hedrick, 27, executed July 20, 2006, was the last Virginia inmate to die in the electric chair.“
I guess the statement below, by Powell, is the closest we’ll see of his ‘ideal standards’.
“Paul feels he convinced Hedrick, so . . . he feels he can’t back out and [die by] lethal injection,“ Sheldon said.“
Isn’t that touching?
The question I had was why did he do it?
An Yahoo search revealed the answers at:
http://www.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/crime/article/EXEC02_20090701-222807/277582/
“One of the lawyers, Jonathan P. Sheldon”
“Powell, an avowed racist, said he stabbed Stacie Lynn Reed, a high school freshman, in her Manassas home after they argued about her black boyfriend. After he killed Stacie, Powell raped and attempted to kill her 14-year-old sister, Kristie.”


Advertisement