Merli Column: The year of the gun

» 4 Comments | Post a Comment

It’s been an odd and deadly spring so far, and I’m not just talking about the weather. More than anything else, the sound of gunfire seems to have filled the air in places where it’s rarely ever heard —
across the globe in the modern city streets of Tehran, inside the U.S. Holocaust Museum a few miles up the road, at an abortion clinic in Kansas, and now at a PRTC bus terminal right here in Prince
William.

Tragic deaths in each instance, unrelated events, all with very different motives, to be sure. But once again what they each have in common is guns — and more to the point, gun accessibility. And while
it’s true that “guns don’t kill people, only people kill people,” it’s also true that it’s a heck of a lot easier to kill people when we allow virtually anyone relatively easy access to firearms. But this is not an
anti-gun campaign.

As this week’s PRTC killings here remind us all too starkly, we have so relatively few murders compared to most major cities that late-breaking news of Monday’s gunfire near Telegraph Road still holds a
lot of initial shock value. When the shock is no longer there, then we’re really in trouble.

Many of us in Prince William have lived in other countries, perhaps in a military or government civilian capacity — including in nations with very strict firearms laws such as most western European nations
or parts of Asia. Try toting a loaded gun on the safe streets of Singapore and it may be the last street you see for a while. And gun crimes in Germany, Great Britain and Switzerland are still so relatively
rare that gun murders still typically glean national media coverage.

Yet gun control laws and the amount of gun-related crimes do not seem to be nearly as related as logic might assume. Crime experts acknowledge, for example, that both Israel and Switzerland have gun
control laws at least as unrestricted as ours. It’s not uncommon for most citizens in these and other countries to readily apply for gun permits and receive them in due course. Yet crimes overseas involving
firearms, on a per capita basis (having little to do with population sizes) are far lower than here. It’s all attitude, I suppose. Ours.

And while liberal access to guns in Prince William and elsewhere in this country surely doesn’t serve as an additional hindrance to our huge problem of gun crimes, it is something in the American psyche
that makes us cleave to our weapons of choice through thick and thin. It is a part of our history and a right granted us under the Constitution. To many, especially outside the cities, guns are arguably as
American as apple pie and July 4th fireworks. And even most gun-control proponents will acknowledge that the vast majority of guns are used the way there were intended — for sport, target practice,
hunting, showing off, and yes, maybe even protection.

Gun crime here seems not to be dwindling into an almost-unheard act of final desperation, but more of a dramatic and conveniently expedient way to “solve” a problem quickly, and all too often,
permanently. And while it can be argued that making guns so readily available perhaps tempts fate a bit too easily among those who have somehow gone off the deep end of the sanity pool, the more
honest reason for the violence surrounding us perhaps lies much more in the quick-fix, economically depressed society of 2009 than in the mere physical availability, and sheer quantity, of guns.

As with most things, it can’t be nearly that simple.

John Merli has been a Prince William County resident since 1984 and Potomac News columnist since 1985. He has worked in the media for more than 30 years. E-mail him at .

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by zcxnissan on June 23, 2009 at 2:01 am

The 2nd Amendment is protection against wayward government. LOL Chris Cummings

Flag Comment Posted by mmarin on June 18, 2009 at 2:32 pm

Justbeingrick,

I would disagree that the SCOTUS ruled that it isn’t a universal right.  They ruled that it was (a universal right) but just like other rights the State can regulate the right (as you said - felons). 

I would disagree with requiring training before ownership of a firearm.  I think it’s prudent for every person to do so but requiring training in order to purchase just doesn’t make sense.  Why should you have to have training to purchase a piece of property?  I don’t need a license to purchase a car nor do I need one to operate it in certain situations.  A firearm in that context is no different than a blender, a piece of jewelery, or a household appliance.

I have no problem with a training requirement in as much as a requirement for the privledge of having a concealed handgun permit.  But, training should not be a requirement to the purchase or ownership of a firearm.

Flag Comment Posted by justbeingrick on June 18, 2009 at 12:50 pm

Its not only having the gun, it’s the ability and training to use it properly.  You pull a gun on someone and you are unable or untrained on its proper use and you get yourself and those around you hurt. 

I own several firearms, i like to shoot and have them in my home for sport as well at protection.  I have a concealed carry permit which allows me to carry a firearm in this and several other states.  The courts have ruled that the 2nd amendment isnt a universal rigth, as such felons cannot own firearms. 

I believe in the right to own a gun, but you should have to complete safety and training classes on thier use.  That would make the community and country safer, not only will potential lawbreakers have to consider that you have a gun but they will be sure that you know how to use it.

Flag Comment Posted by marinm on June 18, 2009 at 7:45 am

One correction I would note.  The Constitution doesn’t grant us the right to have firearms - it was a pre-existing right that the Constitution recognizes and as a written warning to government.

But, what is interesting that with the recession and the massive purchase of firearms by citizens these last 6 months that the national crime rates are actually lower.  I’d love to see a study to see if there is a cause-effect relationship.

As Mr. Merli points out; our crime rate is lower than in major cities.  Could it be because those in DC know if they come to Virginia (PWC) and try to rob a mother while she’s home that she’ll shoot at that intruder?  That our citizens, given the ability to use force upon force, will excercise that right to save and protect there lives and the lives of there family?

As to the comment about protection.  Spot on.  2.5 million defensive uses of firearms in the United States occur every year.  Those are 2.5 million people that are alive today, that weren’t raped, that weren’t gay-bashed, that didn’t have to see a family member taken from them because they had a gun.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement