Math Investigations cost totals $2.4 mil.-so far

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

Between teacher training and material costs, Prince William County Public Schools have spent $2.4 million in three years’ time on Math Investigations.

Investigations is an elementary curriculum that has been implemented county-wide for grades kindergarten through third. Its use has been criticized by many, who decry its holistic approach to math that relies just as much on artwork and demonstrating how a solution is found as it does on providing the correct answer. More than 1,200, as of Wednesday afternoon, have signed an online petition to abolish it from the schools.

The $2.4 million figure reflects specifically “stipends paid to teachers for summer training” on the elementary curriculum, as well as “substitute costs for training that occurred during the school day” for approximately 1,600 teachers and an unspecified number of administrators and supervisory officials, according to a written summary prepared by Pam Gauch, with the office of student learning and accountability.

The figure also includes the purchase of the kits and workbooks needed for implementation.

“The total expenses spent on mathematics professional development related to Investigations since spring of 2006 are $640,214,“ the written summary reads. “Total expense to provide schools with the necessary manipulatives for this program for kindergarten through grade three total $726,559. Kindergarten through second grade manipulative kits were purchased in spring of 2006 and third grade manipulatives were purchased in spring of 2007.“

And elementary schools have spent another $1 million-and-change of textbook funds on “teacher resource packages and student activity books” related to Math Investigations. On that expense, though, the staff report makes clear one point: “Schools would have had these types of expenses regardless of what textbooks were adopted.“

The cost assessment comes weeks after Superintendent Steven L. Walts suggested it was in part the financial investment the schools had already made that rendered nonsensical the idea of abolishing the program. Walts offered that opinion during a public board meeting without speaking of an actual number; staffers later said the school’s math supervisor, Carol Knight, was compiling those cost figures to present to the board.

Freedom of Information Act requests filled by the Potomac News and the Manassas Journal Messenger seeking copies of receipts and purchase orders related to the Math Investigations program are still pending.

The receipts, once received, will clarify further the numbers compiled by the school staffers in relation to the costs of Math Investigations.

Board members were not scheduled to discuss the findings of the staff report at Wednesday’s meeting. One member contacted for comment, however, said it’s too early for sticker shock, given the numbers aren’t provided in the form of comparison with other curriculum purchase costs.

“That’s not an unheard amount of money,“ said Don Richardson, Gainesville District. “Anytime you adopt a curriculum, it’s expensive … and it’s hard to say, without getting any comparison data on other textbooks, it’s really hard to comment.“

From the perspective of parent, however, comes Alexis Miller, who has a kindergartner and second-grader involved in the Math Investigations program, characterizes it as a fuzzy and convoluted system of teaching, and finds the $2.4 million a waste of taxpayer dollars.

“When they continue to [expand Math Investigations] to fourth and fifth grades, you can expect those costs to go even higher,“ she said.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by gregg_reynolds on February 22, 2008 at 9:08 pm

So what in the world is wrong with new math? It is better and faster than the old way. I am 62 years old and have been using it all of my life with great success.

Many people don’t like change. There was a time when most people thought the world was flat and a person was chastised for thinking otherwise. Another time people laughed when they saw the automobile and told the drivers they should get a horse.

I see this as less about new math and the cost of education (which is not much different regardless of the way you teach math) and more about dividing our community over still another issue. First it was immigration now it is education next it will be ... you guess what. I guarantee you it will be something.

The tone within our community comes from the leadership at the top. I have lived in Woodbridge for more than 30 years and have never seen so much ill will and divisiveness as today.

Creating distractions, confusion, resentment and hate only serve to undermine civility and the majority of the residents of Prince William County.

We can do so much better.

Flag Comment Posted by RNZMom on February 21, 2008 at 4:28 pm

They need to rethink this “investment”.  Too many kids are losing out on quality math instruction because of MI.  The parents have done their homework and Walts needs to listen!  School Board:  the true experts in education are the parents of these thousands of elementary level children who are subjected to this “math”.

Flag Comment Posted by PING on February 21, 2008 at 4:09 pm

Thank you Ms. Chumley for your continuing coverage on this story. Every resident should know the impact that this new, expensive, and controversial Math Teaching Program will have on our community and home prices in this area. In a declining market such as this I don’t really see the benefit of being listed on “Weapons of Math Destruction” with a warning to prospective buyers that they teach “Fuzzy Math” here in PWC.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement