KKK graffiti leads to expulsions

KKK graffiti leads to expulsions

Courtesy of NBC Washington

» 90 Comments | Post a Comment

When RC Hawkins Construction Co. president and owner Mike Hawkins came to check on his workers at Sinclair Elementary School on Aug. 25, he was surprised to see police cruisers there.

“I sent my guy to do a job for Finley Paving and there were four cop cars and a truck sitting at the entrance,” said Hawkins. “I was figuring somebody ran into somebody.”

Turns out the police were there to examine the racist symbols made out of sod from his company. The sod was supposed to be used around new curbs and sidewalks at the school. According to police,
four teenagers — three white and one black — were charged with vandalism after using the sod to form the letters “KKK” and the phrase “White Power” along with a swastika in the parking lot of the
Manassas-area school.

All are Stonewall Jackson High School students.

Hawkins then got a call from the father of one of the boys involved. The man wanted his son to help lay sod as a punishment. The man had worked for Hawkins’ father many years ago and felt comfortable
that his son would learn his lesson through a little manual labor.

According to Hawkins, the teen and his friend laid sod until 6 or 7 that evening and he thought the issue was over. Hawkins said that if his had father caught him screwing up as a kid, he would have done
the same thing.

But that was not the end of it. After four of the six Stonewall students involved in the incident were charged with vandalism, two of them were expelled for a full calendar year and the four others were
expelled for at least the rest of the semester.

The Prince William County School Board Disciplinary Committee decided the boys’ fate Wednesday.

Could return sooner
Three of the four individuals whose cases were heard were expelled for the year but could return to school at the start of the second semester in January, provided they complete a certain number of hours
of community service and adhere to a strict behavior contract. The fourth was expelled for the rest of the semester and also has to adhere to similar standards.

All six students were recommended for expulsion by the county’s Office of Student Management and Alternative Programs. The two students who didn’t appeal were expelled for the year.

Hawkins said he believes the issue was blown out of proportion by the schools.

“They are trying to railroad these kids for basically being kids. It’s asinine,” he said.

Hawkins said he was not interviewed by police after the incident and wrote a letter on the family’s behalf that he would not make a legal issue of the matter.

“It [the sod] was my property until they [the schools] paid for it; so if anybody was going to press charges, it would have been me,” Hawkins said. “I had no intent to do any of that.”

The students in question went through a diversions program in lieu of court proceedings and, according to several of the parents, completed the required community service earlier this month. That service
included a trip to the Holocaust Museum.

According to a letter sent Oct. 13 by Juvenile Intake Officer Robert C. Nace to OSMAP Director Pam Brown, if the diversion program is completed by the students, the “complaint will be considered
resolved.”

Rae Roach, the mother of two of the boys involved, said the boys did what they did as a prank and she called the “due process” of the hearings that took place over two months “a miscarriage of justice.”

“All the parents believe they should have been punished,” said Roach. “But they don’t believe the school system should have this kind of leverage over a child’s life to basically put their own twist on these
children’s activities and thoughts.”

Before the hearings Wednesday, Roach said she contacted Del. Jackson H. Miller, R-50th, and Sen. Charles J. Colgan, D-Manassas,  about enacting legislation to “limit the school board’s ability to make these kinds of decisions.”

“It’s opinion-based,” Roach said. “They are saying they [the students] are a threat, they pose a threat and are a potential threat to students, teachers ... and that’s just downright ridiculous. Because they
put hateful words in sod does not make them a threat to anybody. They [Roach’s sons] have been in the [Prince William County] school system their entire academic life and they have never been into
the principal’s office.”

Another parent called the previous hearings, which included a meeting with the Stonewall Jackson High School principal and an OSMAP hearing, “a dog and pony show” meant to show the community
they were out to enforce a “zero tolerance policy” mentioned in the school’s Code of Behavior.

The intention of the code is to guide students’ behavior in the school buildings, on school buses, to and from school, and during participation in any activity sponsored by Prince William County Public
Schools.

Under a section titled Discrimination, it states “All persons and groups within the school are to be treated with dignity and respect. Discrimination on the basis of age, gender, race, color, religion, national
origin, disabilities, economic status, personal and physical characteristics, or other characteristics of individuals or groups will not be tolerated. Actions, gestures, statements (spoken or written), dress,
or symbols which insult, offend, taunt, or demean others because of their individual or group differences may result in corrective action up to and including expulsion.”

Staff writer Kipp Hanley can be reached at 703-878-8062.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by phdee on November 02, 2009 at 4:10 pm

killswitch:

You are so right.  I too have on the one hand been rolling with laughter at the school system.  And these people think they are “educators”?  Boy are our colleges failing.

Flag Comment Posted by Killswitch on November 01, 2009 at 5:45 pm

Go ahead, expel the kids and push them further down a path of ignorance.

Whether it was meant to offend people or not, I don’t think it merits expulsion or criminal charges.

I for one am not bothered by race issues or racism, as long as it doesn’t threaten my personal well being ( or family / friends / etc ).

If someone harbors the ignorance to say hateful things, then let them.  It only does them harm.

You see a swastika laid out on a school parking lot, so what?  The swastika’s meaning if for life and good luck.  I’m sure being laid out by teens it was nothing but laughs for them, and everybody gave it to them.

Flag Comment Posted by Maydel on November 01, 2009 at 8:54 am

What about “no child left behind? in public education. These kids are being left behind in their education when they need it the most. They have not been a problem in the classroom before and a competent educational system should be able to handle kids who have been in some trouble outside of class. Otherwise, 50% or so would not even be there. (I am using that statitistic as the number of HS students who admit to marijuana use - illegal use for anyone in this state)

Don’t think your kids will ever do anything so stupid? Get your head out of the sand.

As for the School Board and the incompetent educators who first recommended expulsion THEY should be on the field trip to the Holocaust Museum. THEY need to learn what happens when a society moves to one track of thought and policy.

The kids involved should be returned to school pronto and never should have been out of school in the first place.

Flag Comment Posted by newssome on November 01, 2009 at 8:19 am

commuter,

I am not here to launch personal attacks over the variations of interpretations of words, be they personal interpretations or literal.
Tail chasing is not one of my preferred activities.

I have stated that I believe this was WRONG, that was never a question.

My point is that when considering what vandalism entails by defintion, this case will be a field day for a few good attorneys.

vandalism:

Main Entry: van·dal·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈvan-də-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1798

willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property

vandalism:

the malicious destruction or defamation of public or private property. — vandal, vandalization


We then must consider what defines, “defacement”

defacement:

de·faced, de·fac·ing, de·fac·es
1. To mar or spoil the appearance or surface of; disfigure.
2. To impair the usefulness, value, or influence of.
3. Obsolete To obliterate; destroy.

Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French *desfacer, *deffacer, from des- de- + face front, face
1 : to mar the appearance of : injure by effacing significant details <deface an inscription>
2 : IMPAIR
3 obsolete : DESTROY

Disfigure?
Impare usefullness?
Destroy?
Obliterate?

If only they would have used a little spray paint, there would be nothing to debate,
unfortunately, they chose a method that has produced almost, 80+ comments on this board alone?

An indicator is what is to come concerning this appeal.

Flag Comment Posted by vmj on November 01, 2009 at 7:54 am

You guys having fun? LOL

“I believe the school system has gone insane in the name of political correctness.
He11, our children cannot even celebrate Halloween, they celebrate Fall because, a jahova’s witness, witch, overzealous religious nut, or an insulted pumpkin may take offense.“

Amen….

Flag Comment Posted by commuter on November 01, 2009 at 7:48 am

Not even sure if I want to wade back into this as the personal attack nature of some of these posts is very counterproductive.

In any event, just a few thoughts. If you disagree with the story or a poster, that is fine. But you cannot change facts to support your disagreement. What the kids did is called vandalism. It is the destruction or defacement of public/private property. Clearly they defaced it. Now it may not be as difficult to clean up as say spray paint, but that doesn’t change the act.

What the kids wrote or spelled out was hateful language. And the fact that they did it on public property at an elementary school for anyone driving by to see - as largely as they did it, means they very much meant it to be seen. They did not do this while doodling at home or under cover in their back yard. There was an intent on these kid’s part. Does it necessarily mean they are going to grow up to be insensitive to race or racists? No, that’s not what this one act says. What it does mean is the parents need to do a recheck of how they think their kids are coming along and perhaps change a few things.

The kids can get their schooling at home now while they are learning how to interact with others in ways that are not overtly offensive. The kids were not beat up b/c of their crime, they were not locked up, they were simply removed from public schooling for a short period as a wake up call that they need to learn how to be more socially skilled - to put it mildly. The fact that a few of you do not see this as hate language is disturbing. It is the behavior that is properly being punished and trying to be rectified as I see it.

Flag Comment Posted by newssome on November 01, 2009 at 7:24 am

phdee,

We agree, (as crazy as it seems)

I do not believe that a “criminal act” took place.  Vandalism, by definition, did not occur. 
Nothing was destroyed.

Stupid and irresponsible, yes, but criminal, no.

I do not believe that any group of people, be they black, white, jewish or any other were mentally or physically injured during the laying of the sod, or during the reading of the letters/words on the pavement.

If these kids had targeted a specific child during this prank, then, yes, I believe stronger punishment would apply. 

This was just generalized ignorance by kids set out to get in to a little mischievousness. (my opinion)

I believe that hate should not be tolerated, based on race, religion, handicaps, anything that defines a human being as him/her self, BUT also…

I believe the school system has gone insane in the name of political correctness.
He11, our children cannot even celebrate Halloween, they celebrate Fall because, a jahova’s witness, witch, overzealous religious nut, or an insulted pumpkin may take offense.

It’s out of control.  Bordering goofiness.

Flag Comment Posted by willow703 on November 01, 2009 at 7:08 am

Ray,
“Or so I guess the school board thinks.“
If you’re thinking this school board thinks, you’re thinking wrong.
This is just one more example of the paint-by-number administrations that have held back the education of our children for
so many years.

Flag Comment Posted by raywilliams on November 01, 2009 at 6:47 am

You guys keep overlooking the obvious.

The three white kids hate Blacks - therefore the KKK formation with the sod.  The Black kid is anti-Jewish, so he laid out the swastika.

What these “hate crime terrorists” did was to pool their resources and work together in a manner that achieved their individual goals ... see, we can get along together when necessary.

Or so I guess the School Board thinks.

Of course, I could be wrong and all four boys may have been members of the Future Farmers of America - studying how sod is rolled and unrolled.

Get ‘em back in school where they belong.

Flag Comment Posted by phdee on October 31, 2009 at 11:14 pm

No Liberalised.  The fact that both whites and a black were involved only proves more convincingly that it was not racism but a harmless prank.

Quit trying to pretend you know something about racism…you don’t.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement