EDITORIAL: What about Obama?
Published: November 5, 2009
The Democrats received a firm trouncing Tuesday night.
Republicans Bob McDonnell, Bill Bolling and Ken Cuccinelli whipped their opponents decisively in the state’s three biggest races.
In our local House of Delegates races only one Democrat, 52nd District’s Luke Torian, won. The 51st District’s incumbent, Democrat Paul Nichols, lost the seat he has held for only one term to
Republican Rich Anderson.
What to say about all this Democrat bashing at the polling place? Well, it seems obvious that Virginia voters have decided to go a little more conservative.
But many are trying to use the Virginia races, particularly for governor, as illustrative of a trend against President Barack Obama. We think drawing that correlation is a bit hasty.
Yes, Virginia went for Obama last year and then elected a Republican governor this year. And yes, we have had a Democratic governor for the last eight years; so this vote, on the surface, would appear
to be a manifestation of the saying, “Throw the bums out!”
However, Virginia leanings have often differed when it comes to presidential races versus state races.
Until last year, support for Republican presidential candidates had continued unabated for decades. Yet, in that time, Virginia did not back away from electing governors of both political persuasions.
What that shows is something of a disconnect between Virginian’s political thinking at the national and state levels.
One explanation is that Virginians make their choices for the state pragmatically, based on more local issues. Otherwise, it would have made sense for Virginians to be electing solely Republicans to the
governor’s mansion for decades, just as they had been choosing the GOP for the White House.
If Virginians were voting pragmatically in the state, then they would less likely be guided by ideology and more willing to choose a Democrat or Republican, provided the candidate had an answer to the
state’s woes.
That would certainly make sense given Tuesday’s results. The McDonnell/Bolling ticket definitely had more solid ideas for transportation, one of the state’s biggest concerns.
One can argue about whether or not McDonnell’s ideas are viable, but it is clear that his plans were more easily demonstrated and understood. If the Democrats had fielded a candidate who was able to
detail better plans, perhaps Tuesday’s results would have been different.
Regardless, as far as Obama’s fate is concerned, we doubt that Tuesday’s election has much to say. Now, next year’s midterm elections . . . those might be a different story.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Pundits. I can barely type the word without wanting to look to the heavens, and scream: Will journatistic integrity ever return to to the world of political reporting?
Tuesday, a very significant number of definable demographic groups refused to come to the polls, thereby demonstrating their dissatisfaction with the Deeds ticket and the leadership of the coordinated campaign. These groups were right to expect that the Democratic Party of Barack Obama and Joseph Biden would be represented in the Commonwealth by candidates fully backing the politics of hope, and positivism. Instead, they got a shrill, negative message that never let up. Even the Obama visit to Norfolk was treated (in Deeds’ final TV ads) more as ‘Dean primal scream,‘ than as a reminder of inspirational Presidential stewardship.
Democrats nationwide were not served well by how the gubernatorial contest in Virginia was conducted, and now the pundits are making matters worse, by making excuses for the media consultants who filled so much airtime with negativism.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement