ENDORSEMENT: Vote Jackson Miller in the 50th District
Published: October 21, 2009
In the 50th District, incumbent Republican Jackson Miller is facing off against Democrat Jeanette Rishell for the third time.
Although Rishell has become a better candidate with each campaign, the third time is not the charm.
Rishell shows a much better grasp of the issues and the details of legislation; however, she still has not demonstrated knowledge that approaches the level of Miller’s.
Also, she shows a level of ambiguity that is unsettling in a potential representative.
Seeming contradictions regarding her stance on stimulus money and on “Right-to-Work” laws make us wonder if she acts out of political expediency or in willful ignorance.
She says that she is for both “Right-to-work” laws and collective bargaining for public employees, and although the two may not be mutually exclusive, they can at least be mutually antagonistic; to
imagine that both can coexist comfortably in Virginia is magical thinking.
On stimulus, Rishell seems to think that the state can take money to expand unemployment benefits without making that expansion permanent, despite the fact that the majority in the House voted
against the money because they did not believe that to be true.
Part of the deal if the state took the money was that the expansion would continue after the federal money ran out. Perhaps it would be possible for the state to go back on that deal, but we don’t think
that is an honorable or honest thing to do.
In his time in the General Assembly, Miller has shown himself to be knowledgeable, proactive, extremely well prepared and honest.
This is the point at which critics will point out his vote on autism legislation. He voted with the majority to prevent an autism bill from leaving a committee and going to the full floor of the House. The vote
effectively killed the bill.
Miller’s position on this legislation bothers us too, but we understand his reasoning when he points out the need to go along with General Assembly protocol on that vote. The legislature is a place where
compromise and devil’s bargains happen, and if Miller did not toe the line from time to time, he may find himself ineffective in the way that other legislators, such as Del. Bob Marshall, have.
On other issues, like alternative energy, Miller has shown himself to be a leader — he sponsored legislation that can help bring wind energy companies to Virginia.
Also, Miller is not arrogant enough to think that he will solve big problems like transportation on his own. However, he approaches such issues with an open mind and does not appear to strictly follow
party lines in his reasoning.
He is a flexible and straightforward delegate. We hope you will cast your vote for Jackson Miller on Nov. 3.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I don’t think you have to hold your nose here. I object to one act, not a whole person.
Just another candidate to hold your nose and vote for. Glad i ain’t in that district.
Firestorm, time is not a luxury that parents of autistic children have. While politically it may be preferable to fight another day, the earlier the medical intervention, the better the outcome for these kids. These are children who need help now, not next session.
Jackson Miller’s vote against the autism bill was procedural and one that needs to live to fight another day.
Too bad the News and Messenger endorsement did not include mention of the fact that Jackson Miller can and does act independently of his Republican colleagues when the need arises. He received the endorsement of both VEA and PWEA for voting to protect the funding for Virginia public schools.
I don’t believe workers who don’t join unions are leeches. Closed shop brings in all sorts of undesirable issues.
Very often the increased money made is eaten up in union dues.
Delegate Miller did more that initially support that bill - he put his name on it as a cosponsor. While the editorial board can dismiss his “critics” as not seeing the benefit of compromise, many of his critics on HB1588 are parents of autistic children and his compromise was our children and their access to medical care.
While I appreciate the editorial board even mentioning Miller’s failure on this matter, to minimize it to a matter of political expediency makes me question if they even have any appreciation of the struggle of raising a child with autism. Your endorsement was spot on in so many areas. I don’t completely dispute it (he has done lots of good things in Richmond), but your comments regarding the autism bill did not go far enough. His feet should be held to fire on that now and in the future. Children with autism deserve better than that.
And regarding Bob Marshall… I only wish I had the honor of voting for that man. He stuck by his promise to parents of autistic children. He fought for us. There is a lot I don’t agree with him on politically, but I admire his ability to stand on his beliefs. If we had more people in Richmond who showed such courage, we would likely be better off.
Genneral Patton:
Extreme views in my post to the editor? Hardly. The paper is basically defunct. I do subscribe—am finished with it each day in under 3 minutes. Usually not more than 6-8 pages. Not enough for the kitty litter box.
I note you couldn’t point out in my post anywhere I am wrong or off track.
The point is, the Republicans are being endorsed by an irrelevant dying newxpaper that has little if any standing in the community. And you know it. Hurts, doesn’t it?
General Patton:
Neither do your Republican views represent the readers…I can make the same ignorant statement as you.
did you query all the readers? How do you know names, address, phone #‘s, e-mail addresses, etc. ? Well, you don’t. You as an ignorant Republican just spouting nonsense.
I must be getting the scum Republicans goat. Ha ha.
A ABC/WP poll just published shows only 20% of citizens consider themselves Republicans. Talk about extinction— and APPROVAL!!! Ha ha.
So, bubba, eat your heart out.
No worries, phdee shows ignorance in just about every post on this forum. Each one is riddled with typos and misspellings. Thus, said opinions have no credibility with this reader. Sign of an educated PhD? Sounds like less than GED quality if you ask me.
“These non joiners are parasites and free loaders.“
Not a truer statement has been said with regards to other things.. Like healthcare, taxes, welfare, and a myrid of other social programs.
When we can eliminate unions from this state we’ll be free to have people earn there keep and not have to free load off those that produce.


Advertisement