Gray Column: State police just doing their jobs

» 6 Comments | Post a Comment

One of the most frustrating things about commuting these days are violators. That being people who get on the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes without have the three drivers required.

So when I heard that the Virginia State Police (VSP) was cracking down on HOV violators I was pleased. Not because I like seeing people get tickets, but it is always good to keep the HOV lanes open
for those who deserve to be there.

Not only were VSP efforts good for stopping violators but also for safety reasons. Apparently the police arrested someone for driving under the influence on the lanes as well. That is especially dangerous
because people tend to lean a little harder on the gas peddle when on the HOV. And yes, speeding in general is an issue as well. 

But last Wednesday, when VSP conducted their HOV patrols, speed wasn’t the issue. There were a lot of complaints that the police activity was slowing down the flow of the lanes.  Things were rather
stacked up, but it turns out the back up wasn’t from the police. It was from people in the HOV lanes looking at a crash in the opposite lanes — something I wish could also be considered an HOV
violation, but I digress.

But to be honest with you, even if the backup had been caused by police activity, it would have been worth it. I can remember many times when VSP road checks had cars back up getting on the HOV
lanes. I find nothing wrong with this.  At least we know they are making an effort to catch violators.

Everyday I see people sneaking onto the lanes normally with just the driver in the car. Most days there are not enough of these drivers to cause a backup but nevertheless, fair is fair. Plus there are the
rare occasions when the lanes are rather backed up and you do see a significant number of violators in the mix of traffic. 

This especially happens during this time of year in the afternoon hours. Around 5 p.m. it starts getting dark and harder to point out HOV violators.

I can even remember a few years back seeing someone with two manikins in their car dressed to look like riders. I kid you not; I really did see this.

But for even the occasional violator who doesn’t go to that extent, he or she needs to be stopped. 

The HOV lanes are the only thing that can be pointed to as a real success in combating traffic congestion on Interstate 95. For those folks unwilling to pick up slugs or find carpoolers willing to ride, there
really is no excuse. 

True there are probably more clean fuel cars on the HOV that contribute to traffic than violators, but at least they are legal — for now.

So if seeing the police on I-95 making frequent stops or slowing down access points frustrates you, don’t blame the police, blame the violators. Think of it like this: If it weren’t for people misusing the
HOV, there would be no need for increased VSP patrols.

Also keep this in mind: If you think their job is hard now and slowing down the traffic, imagine what things are going to be like when the VSP has to sift out HOV violators from those who are by
themselves but have paid a toll to be on the lanes. I am sure someone smarter than I is working on a solution to that problem — at least I hope so.

Davon Gray works in Washington and resides in Woodbridge. Contact him at .

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Charles on November 01, 2009 at 10:22 pm

Ron, if people “know” that the police will only watch a few places, they will work around those places.  Enforcement at entrance/exits should work on roads with limited access, if the police have enough free officers to guard all the entrances or exits.

But yes, enforcement can cause trouble.  We can be mad at the police for enforcing the law, or we could be mad at the people who are breaking the law, making the police have to inconvenience all of us to enforce the law.

Flag Comment Posted by RonCharest on October 26, 2009 at 6:52 am

jpodski,

I already get to work in downtown DC about 7:00AM in normal HOV commuting traffic.  Had Mr. Gray, or any of the journalists working for this newspaper (which transcribed the incident verbatim from a police spokesperson) commited an actual act of journalism, they might hve learned that because of the police roadblock, some people got to work up to 1 hour late that morning.

The police monitor off ramps in the afternoons, and on ramps in the mornings.  There was no valid reason they couldn’t monitor the on-ramps that particular morning.  They I have no problem with monitoring the on-ramps - as the HOV is limited entrances, that would be an effective way to catch violators.

Flag Comment Posted by RonCharest on October 26, 2009 at 6:45 am

Good Morning willow703,

3 Drivers = 1 Driver, 2 Passengers / Slugs

You got me.  I plead early morning and lack of caffein to get my brain/finger interface working correctly.

Flag Comment Posted by jpodski on October 26, 2009 at 6:38 am

Wow Ron,

Don’t be so upset. You know the check at exit 4 was to catch people going into the city, since there is no place to catch violators who go directly into the city on I395. They would get a free ride and blend in with the rest of the traffic off of the 14th street bridge and main lanes of 95. 

Hey, at least they said they were going to do the enforcement. Next time you may just want to leave earlier.

Flag Comment Posted by willow703 on October 26, 2009 at 6:33 am

Three drivers per car in the HOV lanes? If we had that in the regular lanes traffic would move a lot faster.

Flag Comment Posted by RonCharest on October 26, 2009 at 4:58 am

Mr Gray,

You apparently did not drive the HOV last Wendesday.  I did.  There were two causes of the backup - a crash around Springfield which did slow things up due to Looky-loos, and a police roadcheck up around Exit 4 on 395.

I’m all in favor of the police enforcing the HOV-3, and have no sympathy for people caught violating the 3 to a car rule.  However, there are better ways of doing this - like having police road checks at the HOV exits or on-ramps.  You know, the way the police already do every single day.

There was no vald reason for police to slow traffic down with a mid-road blockade.  They were wrong, and you don’t need to make rationalizations for them - especially where you apparently have no first-hand knowledge of the incident.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement